Legal Opinion

Hathaway v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 10, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Buchanan District Court, Hon. J. J. Tolerton, Judge. Action to recover damages for burning grass. Trial to a jury, verdict for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

I. This is an action to recover damages for negligently permitting fire to escape from defendant’s locomotive, which fire, it is claimed, destroyed the grass upon plaintiff’s land. There is no question as to the escape of the fire, and it is equally clear that it burned over the ground of plaintiff. The only controversy is over the question of damages. As the jury returned a verdict for the defendant, it is apparent that they found that the fire caused no damage to the plaintiff. The evidence as to the value of the grass burned was conflicting. Some of it tended to show that it was worth…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woodward v. HorstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  2. Croddy v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parsons v. First National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Douglass ex rel. Osborne v. AgneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Hoeft v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. Behrendt v. AhlstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Montgomery v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API