Hardy v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLEMAN, J.
Following a bench trial, Carol J. Hardy was convicted for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute. The issues on appeal are (1) whether Hardy has standing to object to the search of the vehicle he was driving, and (2) whether the police conducted a valid consent search of the automobile’s trunk. We hold that, although Hardy has standing to object under the Fourth Amendment, the police conducted a valid search of the automobile’s trunk by virtue of the owner’s consent to search. The evidence was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hardy knowingly…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hetmeyer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
- State v. DuboseOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Watts v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- State v. VanhollebekeWashington Supreme Court · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.