Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Quinlivan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 26, 1978No. 3588-2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSoule, J.

Gary Lee Quinlivan has filed a personal restraint petition seeking credit for time spent in presen-tence confinement against the discretionary minimum sentence imposed by the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles. *241Two issues are raised in his petition: (1) whether such credit is constitutionally required under the state and federal provisions of due process, equal protection and the prohibition against multiple punishments, and (2) whether any credit is required under RCW 9.95.063 as presently interpreted by the Washington Supreme Court. We hold that credit for such presentence detention time is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. J. Loyd Parker, Jr. v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. William Dunn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  4. Donald R. Ham v. State of North Carolina v. Lee Bounds, Prison DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  5. Reanier v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PhelanWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re the Personal Restraint of KnappWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of TrambitasWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint of TrambitasWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. PhelanWashington Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API