Legal Opinion

Barnett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1931No. 14000Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant urges that we should regard the notation on bills of exception over his attorney’s signature as a sufficient exception to the court’s qualification to said bills; it is further insisted that the case of Miller v. State, 104 Texas Crim. Rep., 205, 282 S. W., 812, cited in our original opinion, does not support our holding, but is dicta.

As suporting the proposition that this court is bound by the qualification to a bill unless an objection or exception to the qualification is *599authenticated by the trial judge, and that the mere notation of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Serna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Nicholson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
  4. Ashley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Scherpig v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API