Legal Opinion

Roe v. Hopper

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1965No. 9669PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNUDSON, Justice.

This action was commenced by plaintiff-appellant, James A. Roe, seeking a declaratory judgment of his rights under the provisions of I.C. §§ 23-942, 23-944, 23-946, and for an order restraining defendant-respondent, E. R. Hopper, Commissioner of Law Enforcement, from requiring appellant to maintain a sign over the doorway to his dining room restricting its use by minors. From a judgment requiring appellant to maintain such sign, this appeal is taken.

The issues were presented to the trial court upon stipulated facts which disclose that appellant is a sub-lessee of two rooms in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Haworth v. BerntsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Burnham v. HendersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Koon v. BottolfsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Cameron v. Lakeland Class a School District No. 272Idaho Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. SylvaHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. White v. MockIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. WiedmeierIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Willows v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API