Niagara Sprayer Co. v. Wood
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oceana; Sullivan, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Niagara Sprayer Company against Susie M. Wood upon a promissory note. There was a claim of recoupment. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Per curiam
The action is assumpsit. The trial was before the court without a jury. Findings of fact and law were made and filed. These the plaintiff moved to amend and the motion was denied. There are 14 assignments of error, 4 of which relate to rulings admitting or rejecting testimony. The index to the record does not show where the exceptions (if there were exceptions) upon which these are predicated may be found in the record. Nor is the omission supplied in the brief for appellant, nor is there argument addressed to these assignments.
This court has sometimes, as matter of grace, assumed the labor…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yanelli v. LittlejohnMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Mills v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Duff v. JudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jersey Shore Trust Co. v. Owosso Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Oudersluys v. CarstensMichigan Supreme Court · 1917