Legal Opinion
Jones v. Allen
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 27, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*444OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
The major issue decided on this appeal concerns the constitutionality of RPAPL 747-a, which bars the granting of stays in nonpayment proceedings brought in the City of New York after five days have elapsed following the entry of judgment unless the amount of the judgment has either been paid to the landlord or deposited into court. In Lang v Pataki (271 AD2d 375, affg 176 Misc 2d 676), the Appellate Division, First Department, held that RPAPL 747-a is not unconstitutional on its face because it does not infringe upon the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v. LezakNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. . GlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Riglander v. Star Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Landmark Properties v. OlivoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
- 41st Avenue Realty Associates L. L. C. v. Choices Women's Medical Center, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001