Legal Opinion
Popkin Bros. v. Volk's Tire Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 15, 1941PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Oliphaxt. S. 0. C.
This matter is before me sitting as a Supreme Court Commissioner on a motion to strike the complaint on two grounds, that the plaintiff is not a proper party plaintiff and that the suit is by one tort feasor against another alleged tort feasor for contribution or reimbursement.
*2Plaintiff was engaged in the. produce business in the City of Trenton and as such operated a fleet of trucks. It entered into an agreement with the defendant whereby it bought tires and tubes for its trucks from it who agreed to service, inspect and keep in good and safe repair and running condition…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Busch & Latta Painting Co. v. Woermann Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- Wise Shoes, Inc. v. BlattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Fowler v. Borough of Jersey ShoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Public Service Railway Co. v. MatteucciSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- Jones v. U-Drive-It CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
3Cited by30 opinions
- Slattery v. Marra Bros., Inc. Marra Bros., Inc. v. Wm. Spencer & Son CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Michelin Tire Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Public Service Elec. and Gas Co. v. WaldroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Mayer v. FAIRLAWN JEWISH CENTER AND RANDALL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Jennings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.