Colonial Creosoting Co. v. Perry
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This controversy grows out of the construction of a bridge across the Tangipahoa river, on the Hammond-Coving-ton Highway, within the parish of Tangipa-hoa.
The contract for the bridge was let, by joint authority of the Louisiana highway commission and the police jury of Tangipa-hoa parish, to one A. E. Perry, at the price of $37,648.54. The contract was in writing and duly recorded.
A bond was executed by the contractor, with the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as surety. The bond was attached to and recorded with the contract, and was conditioned according to law for the faithful…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Red River Const. Co. v. Pierce Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Haynesville Lumber Co. v. CaseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
3Cited by16 opinions
- Long Bell Lumber Co. v. S. D. Carr Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Rester v. Moody & StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- John H. Murphy Iron Works v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Martinolich v. AlbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.