Legal Opinion

Colonial Creosoting Co. v. Perry

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 8, 1929No. 27976PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This controversy grows out of the construction of a bridge across the Tangipahoa river, on the Hammond-Coving-ton Highway, within the parish of Tangipa-hoa.

The contract for the bridge was let, by joint authority of the Louisiana highway commission and the police jury of Tangipa-hoa parish, to one A. E. Perry, at the price of $37,648.54. The contract was in writing and duly recorded.

A bond was executed by the contractor, with the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as surety. The bond was attached to and recorded with the contract, and was conditioned according to law for the faithful…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Red River Const. Co. v. Pierce Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Haynesville Lumber Co. v. CaseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Long Bell Lumber Co. v. S. D. Carr Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Rester v. Moody & StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  3. Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. John H. Murphy Iron Works v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. Martinolich v. AlbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API