Legal Opinion
Red River Const. Co. v. Pierce Petroleum Corporation
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 13, 1928No. 28877PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
The Red River Construction Company was the contractor for the construction of two portions of a highway in Natchitoches parish, designated by the Louisiana highway commission as projects “429-D” and “430-A,” and furnished bond in accordance with the terms of Act 224 of 1918. The contractor sublet the work of hauling and spreading gravel on the roadway to C. Nordstrom, who purchased the oil and gasoline for use in his trucks from the Pierce Petroleum Company. The subcontractor failed to pay for the oil and gasoline thus furnished, and the Pierce Petroleum Company made an affidavit and filed it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Alpena ex rel. Besser v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Shultz v. C. H. Quereau Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Philadelphia v. MaloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- S. B. Luttrell & Co. v. Knoxville, La Follette & Jellico RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- City of Alpena ex rel. Zess v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Long Bell Lumber Co. v. S. D. Carr Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Rester v. Moody & StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- John H. Murphy Iron Works v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.