Legal Opinion
(PC) Wilhelm v. Aung
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 16, 2025No. 2:22-cv-02323Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVE WILHELM, No. 2:22-cv-02323 DJC SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SANDAR AUNG, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the undersigned are the parties’ cross motions 19 for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that 20 plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 41) be denied, and defendant’s motion for…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.