Legal Opinion
R P. Adams Co. v. Nist
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph J. Sedita, J.
This matter is brought on pursuant to article 7 of the New York State Real Property Tax Law. The petitioner herein seeks a reversal of a determination of the Assessment Board of Review of the Town of Tonawanda. The board had affirmed a determination by the Town Assessor that property leased by the petitioner from the Erie County Industrial Development Agency (hereinafter referred to as ECIDA) was subject to taxation. Under a provision of said lease, the petitioner is liable for any taxes imposed upon the premises.
The R. P. Adams Company is a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glassman v. GlassmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- People Ex Rel. American Bible Society v. Commissioners of Taxes & Assessments for the CityNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Rochester Housing Authority v. Sibley Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1923
- Lutheran High School Assn of New York City, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lincoln Savings Bank, FSB v. Suffolk County Treasurer (In re Parr Meadows Racing Ass'n)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- In Re Parr Meadows Racing Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- R. P. Adams Co. v. NistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979