Legal Opinion

Womack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 7, 1993No. 92-1584PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOANOS, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Charles V. Womack, Jr., appeals the judgment and sentence imposed upon his conviction after retrial. Appellant contends the sentence imposed after his successful appeal was harsher than the original sentence, and since the trial court did not give a reason for the increase, the North Carolina v. Pearce1 presumption of vindictiveness was not dispelled. We conclude the sentencing disposition at resen-*1108tencing was improper in the circumstances of this case.

An information filed June 20, 1990, charged that between the dates of December 1 to 31, 1989, appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Wemett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  5. Morganti v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API