Legal Opinion

Rheinstrom v. Conner

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 29, 1940No. 5191, Civ. A. No. 85PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRUFFEL, District Judge.

The above entitled cases for refund of income taxes claimed erroneously assessed, were submitted for decision by the court upon the pleadings, agreed stipulation of facts and oral testimony, a jury being waived.

These cases grow out of the same set of facts and will be treated as one.

From a consideration of the evidence the court finds as a matter of fact: That the Karl Kiefer Machine Company, an Ohio corporation, was organized in the year 1908 with an authorized capital of $500,000, consisting of 3,000 shares of common stock, par value $100, 2,000 shares of preferred…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Leland v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
  5. Hellman v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. O'MALLEYDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1943
  2. Stern v. HarrisonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1944
  3. Kerr v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API