Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Nishiki

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1982No. 7956PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, J.

Defendants-appellants appeal from the summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs-appellees, who brought this defamation action for statements made by appellants Wayne Nishiki and Rick Reed in the 1978 election campaign. From the evidence presented in the record, we find there are genuine issues of material fact. We accordingly reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand this case for trial.

I

During the 1978 election campaign, The Valley Isle, a biweekly newspaper published by defendant-appellant Valley Isle Publishers, Inc., ran an article written by…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Dairy Stores, Inc. v. Sentinel Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Esmark, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. GECC Financial Corp. v. JaffarianHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API