Legal Opinion

State v. Wittman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1959No. 1130PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

The appellant, Alice Wittman, was convicted under A.R.S. § 13-311 of obtaining money by means of a false or bogus check issued with intent to defraud Basha’s Market on March 14, 1957. Her motions for a directed verdict and for a new trial were denied.

She appeals on the sole ground that she was tried under the wrong statute, contending that only A.R.S. § 13-316, and not A.R.S. § 13-311, was applicable in a situation where the defendant drew a check on insufficient funds rather than on no funds at all. A.R.S. § 13-316, dealing with checks drawn on insufficient funds with intent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Broome v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. MacMullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API