Legal Opinion

Greathouse v. Millard

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 12, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Commissioner.

This is a receivership proceeding in which it was adjudged that appellant obtained approximately $11,000 as a preference from an insolvent debtor and that said sum must be returned for the benefit of all the insolvent’s creditors as provided by KRS 378.060.

Appellant for some time had financed the purchase of new automobiles under an arrangement known as “floor planning” for the Thompson-Gordon Motors Company. Under this arrangement appellant would pay for the new cars, the Motors Company would execute demand notes covering the purchase prices, and would execute chattel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen's Sons v. Dillingham's AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  2. Union Trust & Savings Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Gaines v. HillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Commonwealth v. CrumeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. McKee v. ScobeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Rexplore Drilling, Inc., Debtor. J. Hunt Perkins, Trustee v. Petro Supply Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Bomanzi of Lexington, Inc. v. TafelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  3. In Re Rexplore Drilling, Inc., Debtor. J. Hunt Perkins, Trustee v. Petro Supply Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API