Union Trust & Savings Co. v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from the Mason Circnit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Response to Petition Por, Rehearing and Extended Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Hobson.
It is insisted by counsel in the petition for rehearing that the opinion is in conflict with a number of previous decisions of the court. Counsel quote the folloAving sentence from the opinion:. “The letters of Marshall, his will and the other-proof in the record, leave no doubt in our minds that he did not in fact contemplate being insolvent, or in fact intend to prefer the creditors whom he paid off on May 6th, to his other creditors.” (See Union Trust Co. Etc. v. Taylor, 139 Ky. 283.)
*184They insist…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thompson v. Heffner's executorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
- Heidrich & Co. v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
- Northern Bank v. Farmers' Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Allen's Sons v. Dillingham's AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
- Union Trust & Savings Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bomanzi of Lexington, Inc. v. TafelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- State Bank of Stearns v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- McKinney Deposit Bank v. Cyrus W. Scott Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Greathouse v. MillardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958
- May v. Pikeville National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.