Legal Opinion

Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Chicco USA, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 30, 2018No. 1:09-cv-03339Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KOLCRAFT ENTERPRISES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 09 CV03339 ) v. ) Judge Edmond E. Chang ) CHICCO USA, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW Defendant, Artsana USA, Inc. (“Artsana”), by and through its attorneys, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a), hereby submits its Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law in its favor and against Plaintiff Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. (“Kolcraft”). INTRODUCTION Artsana has now closed its case.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  3. Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. Pannu v. Iolab Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API