Legal Opinion

Shankland v. Mayor of Washington

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 21, 1831PublishedCited by 26 opinions

This ease was brought up by writ of error to the Circuit Court of the i District of Columbia, for the county of Washington, and after argument, at January term 1830, was held under advisement until this term. *The facts of the case, with the exception of those stated more particularly in the opinion of the court, in this case, are the same *- with those of the case of Clark v. Corporation of Washington, reported in 12 Wheat. 40.

1Opinion of the Court

Story, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. — This is a writ of error to the circuit court of the district of Columbia, sitting in the county of Washington. The original action was brought by the plaintiff in error, to recover the amount of one-half of the prize of $25,000, which was drawn in a lottery authorized by the corporation of Washington, by ticket No. 5591, of which the plaintiff asserted himself to be the owner and possessor, in the manner hereafter stated. The declaration was for money had and received ; and it was- agreed by the parties, to state a case, and if upon the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mandeville v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. Clark v. Mayor, Aldermen, and Common Council of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Lewis A. ZipkinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. EliasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Suydam v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  4. Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  5. Doleman v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API