Legal Opinion

Clark v. Neal

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 9, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01013Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION DOMINIQUE D. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:23-CV-1013-PPS-JPK RON NEAL, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Dominique D. Clark, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF 1.) As required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, I must screen the complaint and dismiss it if it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. To proceed beyond the pleading stage, a complaint must contain…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API