Legal Opinion

City of Durham v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 1999No. COA99-101PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 28A-19-6 (1984) dictates that the costs of an estate administration must be paid before all other claims. In this case, however, the City and County of Durham argue that their tax liens against real property held in an open estate take precedence to the costs of administration. We agree and therefore hold that the trial court erred in preventing the foreclosure proceeding to collect the tax liens against real property held in an open estate.

Leila Phillips died in 1975 leaving by will two adjacent properties on Teel Street in Durham County to her grandson, James…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rigsbee v. . BrogdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Sherrod v. . DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Moore v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Guilford County v. Estates Administration, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Farmville Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. BourneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ARCHER EX REL. ARCHER v. Estate of ArcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API