Legal Opinion

United States v. Clifford Frank Campbell and John Clifton Free

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1969No. 27116_1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge:

Appellants in this moonshine case argue that questions propounded by the Judge at trial constituted prejudicial error, but they did not object to or otherwise call this claimed error to the attention of the Trial Judge. Under such circumstances the result is an affirmance unless we find plain error. F.R. Crim.P. 52(b). We cannot so we affirm. 1

Although we are mindful of the fact that a criminal defendant is himself the one who must bear the burdens of imprisonment from actions or inactions of his counsel, whether retained or court appointed, we consider that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. George Lee Mims, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Oren Alan Kyle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. AdkissonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. Hampton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. MarquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. HennessyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API