United States v. Concepcion Marie Ledesma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
This is the latest in a series of cases confronting this Court concerning traffic stops based on problems with temporary registration tags. We hold that displaying a temporary tag behind a heavily tinted rear window violates a Kansas statute requiring that licence plates appear “in a place and position to be clearly visible.” See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 8-133. State troopers therefore did not exceed the permissible scope of their traffic stop by issuing a citation and requesting consent for a subsequent search. We affirm the decision of the district court.
I. Factual…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. McCulloughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- United States v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Cruz-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.