Legal Opinion

United States v. Concepcion Marie Ledesma

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 19, 2006No. 05-3163PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

This is the latest in a series of cases confronting this Court concerning traffic stops based on problems with temporary registration tags. We hold that displaying a temporary tag behind a heavily tinted rear window violates a Kansas statute requiring that licence plates appear “in a place and position to be clearly visible.” See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 8-133. State troopers therefore did not exceed the permissible scope of their traffic stop by issuing a citation and requesting consent for a subsequent search. We affirm the decision of the district court.

I. Factual…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. McCulloughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. United States v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Cruz-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API