New Jersey Traction Co. v. Gardner
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
*572The opinion of the court was delivered by ■
Nixon, J.
The defendant in error, in alighting from a street oar owned and operated in the city of Newark by the plaintiff in error, was severely injured and recovered damages in a suit in the Essex Circuit Court. The judgment was affirmed in the Supreme Court, and is now brought here for review.
The first alleged error is the refusal of the trial judge to nonsuit the plaintiff. The declaration in the case alleged, among other things, that the cause of the plaintiff’s injury was the sudden and violent movement of the car from a slow to a rapid rate of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. MumfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Linch v. Pittsburgh Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. BolesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- McCullom v. Atlantic City & Shore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Paganini v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904