Legal Opinion
Polnac v. City of Sulphur Springs
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided August 18, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00666Unknown
1Opinion
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION MICHAEL POLNAC, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20-CV-00666 § Judge Mazzant CITY OF SULPHUR SPRINGS, JOSHUA § § DAVIS, and JUSTIN FINDLEY, § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Officers Davis and Findley’s First Amended Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #25) and the City of Sulphur Springs’ First Amended Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #26). Having considered the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the Officers’ motion should be granted in part and denied in part, and the…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.