Legal Opinion

Jean v. Nester

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 1927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

These are two actions of tort. One is brought by Rita Jean (hereinafter called the plaintiff) for personal injuries sustained by her when struck by an automobile driven by the defendant as she was crossing South Main Street, Fall River. She was seven years, two or three months old at the time of the accident. The other action is by her father to recover for expenses.

There was evidence that South Main Street runs north and south and is forty feet wide from curb to curb; that from the curb on the east side to the nearest car rail is about twelve feet eight inches; that there are “two sets of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jeddrey v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Hicks v. H. B. Church Truck Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Gibb v. HardwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Creedon v. GalvinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Doyle v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. GouldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Bessey v. SalemmeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Birch v. StroutMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Mulroy v. MarinakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Sooserian v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API