People v. Concha
California Court of Appeal
1Concurrence
I concur in the judgment except I would reduce the murder convictions from first to second degree. I agree with the Attorney General that there is substantial evidence to support liability on a provocative act theory. But defendants are correct: the fact that the provocative act theory applies does not permit the return of first degree murder verdicts; transferred intent rules do not apply to this case; and because the decedent, Max Sanchez, was an accomplice, the first degree findings cannot be justified on a felony-murder rule theory. The provocative act doctrine is a form of implied malice…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. SappCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. Nieto BenitezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. BraxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.