People v. Nieto Benitez
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, J.
—This case presents the question whether the act of brandishing a firearm may constitute an act sufficiently dangerous to life to support a conviction of second degree murder on an implied malice theory. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 189.)1 The Court of Appeal held that although the act of intentionally firing a handgun could support a finding of malice, the act of intentionally brandishing a handgun, as a matter of law, could not support such a finding. Because the trial court’s instructions permitted the jury to base a finding of malice on defendant’s intentional…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. MoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. EarpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. CoddingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.