Legal Opinion

People v. Nieto Benitez

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1992No. S022789PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

—This case presents the question whether the act of brandishing a firearm may constitute an act sufficiently dangerous to life to support a conviction of second degree murder on an implied malice theory. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 189.)1 The Court of Appeal held that although the act of intentionally firing a handgun could support a finding of malice, the act of intentionally brandishing a handgun, as a matter of law, could not support such a finding. Because the trial court’s instructions permitted the jury to base a finding of malice on defendant’s intentional…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. MoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. EarpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. CoddingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API