State Ex Rel. Haun v. Hoffman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Because of the interest of the public in the preservation of the marital status, divorce suits are accorded-different treatment from ordinary civil actions, and it becomes the duty of a court in such cases to be vigilant against collusion and to see that there is compliance with the applicable statutes. 14 Ohio Jurisprudence, 377, Section 3; 20 Ann. Cas., 341. Divorce, of course, is entirely a statutory matter.
Since the early case of Harter v. Harter, 5 Ohio, 318, the courts of Ohio have been prone to give a strict construction- to the divorce laws and have held that the statutes relating to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Black v. BlackOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Tucker v. TuckerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Calvert v. CalvertOhio Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hanna v. HannaOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Van DeRyt v. Van DeRytOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Smith v. FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Engh v. HoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1946