Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Haun v. Hoffman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1945No. 30252PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Because of the interest of the public in the preservation of the marital status, divorce suits are accorded-different treatment from ordinary civil actions, and it becomes the duty of a court in such cases to be vigilant against collusion and to see that there is compliance with the applicable statutes. 14 Ohio Jurisprudence, 377, Section 3; 20 Ann. Cas., 341. Divorce, of course, is entirely a statutory matter.

Since the early case of Harter v. Harter, 5 Ohio, 318, the courts of Ohio have been prone to give a strict construction- to the divorce laws and have held that the statutes relating to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Black v. BlackOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Tucker v. TuckerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Calvert v. CalvertOhio Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hanna v. HannaOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Van DeRyt v. Van DeRytOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State Ex Rel. Engh v. HoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API