Autry v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for capital murder. After finding appellant guilty, the jury answered “yes” to the first two special issues under Art. 37.071(b), V.A. C.C.P. Punishment was assessed at death.
In his second ground of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. The court charged the jury on the law of circumstantial evidence. The indictment in the instant cause alleges in pertinent part that on or about April 20, 1980, appellant:
“did then and there while in the course of committing and attempting to commit…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.