Legal Opinion
Carey v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 23, 2004No. AC 24655PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner, Charles Carey. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly found that: (1) he received effective assistance of counsel and (2) his Alford1 plea was made in a knowing, voluntary and intelligent manner.2 We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The petitioner entered a guilty plea under the doctrine enunciated in North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S. Ct. 160, 27 L. Ed. 2d 162 (1970), to the charge of *182sexual assault in the first degree in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Beasley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- State v. CasadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bowden v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Almedina v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. LittleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Toles v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Mock v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.