Legal Opinion
United States v. Christie
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 7, 2017No. 08 Cr. 1244PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Sweet, D.J.
The United States of America (the “Government”) has moved pursuant to Rule 32.2(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), to Substitute Assets to include certain property of David Christie, a/k/a “Big Man,” (“Christie” or the “Defendant”) as substitute assets to be applied towards the forfeiture money judgment that was entered against Christie in the above-captioned case on or about January 19, 2011. Based on the conclusions set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Prior Proceedings
On or about May…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Wayne Gaskin, AKA "Atiba," and Al CastleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Charles L. Jackson, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Gary D. Bollin, United States of America v. Ernst N. Tietjen, United States of America v. James GormleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. ContorinisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- David Christie v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019