Legal Opinion
Republic National Bank v. Zito
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 26, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Marie Zito and Betty Noto appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated December 20, 1999, as granted the plaintiff’s motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.
It is well established that a party moving for summary judg*658ment must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, offering sufficient evidence to demonstrate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Village Bank v. Wild Oaks Holding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Wasserman v. HarrimanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Dinardo v. Patcam Service Station, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- EMC Mortgage Corp. v. Riverdale AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Valley National Bank v. DeutschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- McCormack & Phillips v. KrimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Meyer v. La BarberaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006