Legal Opinion

United States v. Palermo

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 1957No. Crim. 19189PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the information charging defendant with “wilfully and knowingly” failing to pay his 1953 federal income tax when due, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 145(a) — 1939 I.R.C. — and with “wilfully and knowingly” failing to pay his 1954 federal income tax when due, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 7203 — 1954 I.R.C.

The defendant alleges these reasons as grounds for his motion:

1. “The Information Does Not State Facts Sufficient to Constitute an Offense against the United States.”

The defendant filed 1953 and 1954…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Neild v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. James C. Ausmus, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States Ex Rel. Miller v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. City of Detroit v. PillonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. State v. VerrueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Commonwealth v. Kessler, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API