Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Bowersock

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1917No. 20,752PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Douglas district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to recover for part performance of a contract to construct a reenforced concrete floor in a warehouse which was destroyed by fire before the floor was completed. The plaintiff recovered and the defendant appeals.

The contract was formed by acceptance of the following proposal:

“We hereby propose to furnish all labor and material, and construct reenforced concrete floor in warehouse with necessary columns and column footings, using Turner System of reenforcing as designed by C. A. P. Turner of Minneapolis, Minnesota. This…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duncan v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  2. Young v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Kanzius v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burner v. Northwestern Bible & Missionary Training SchoolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Fritts v. QuintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. OTTAWA PLUMBING, HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING CO v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  4. Ottawa Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Robb v. PartenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API