Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Township of Harmar

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-1428PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ZIEGLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff leased residential property that previously had been re-zoned for industrial use. Hoping to put a mobile home on the property, he applied for a building permit, but his application was denied on May 1, 1983. Plaintiff appealed and a public hearing was held. On June 28, 1983, plaintiff was granted a variance. This decision by the Board was appealed by the Township of Harmar through the actions of the individual defendants and the issue of plaintiff’s standing was raised. The standing issue was resolved by the state court in plaintiff’s favor.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. De Botton v. Marple TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Janicsko v. PellmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Pierce v. Montgomery County Opportunity Board, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. D'AURIZIO v. Palisades ParkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  5. D'AURIZIO v. Palisades ParkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API