Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Herman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 19, 2009No. SC07-363PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Jeffrey Marc Herman be found guilty of professional misconduct and suspended from the practice of law for ninety days followed by a period of probation for two years, publicly reprimanded, and taxed with costs. The terms of the probation period recommended by the referee included the requirement that Herman perform two hundred hours of pro bono legal services at a rate of one hundred hours per year. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

For the reasons expressed below, we approve the referee’s findings of fact and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. Florida Bar v. RotsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. The Florida Bar v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Florida · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Kelsay Dayon PattersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  2. The Florida Bar v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  3. Florida Bar v. AdornoSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. Florida Bar v. DohertySupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  5. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API