Heady v. Boden

This was an action by the appellee against the appellants and one Charles Richart upon a promissory note executed by them to the appellee.

The appellant Larue Heady filed an answer consisting of one paragraph, alleging that at the time of the execution of the note sued on, he was an infant under the age of twenty-one years.-

To this answer the appellee filed a reply containing two paragraphs, the second of which was a general denial. The first paragraph alleges that said Larue Heady, after he arrived at the age of twenty-one years, and before the commencement of this suit, with knowledge that…