Legal Opinion

Blumenthal v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 11, 1925No. Nos. 1343, 1344PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLEDSOE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs were indicted in this court, charged with a conspiracy to violate the Lever Act (Comp. St. 3918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 3115%e et seq.). They entered pleas of not guilty, were tried before a jury and found guilty, and each of them was adjudged by the court to pay a fine of $2,501. Plaintiffs paid the fines without protest. It does not even appear that the fines were paid as a condition precedent to their enlargement from custody, or for any similar reason. Upon a judgment regularly rendered after trial the defendants suffered voluntary compliance with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Langford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. City of Miami v. KetonSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  3. Callahan v. SandersDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1971
  4. Deppe v. LufkinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  5. Schaible v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API