Legal Opinion

Slusher v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 5, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Perry

Reversing.

The appellants, Roy Slusher and Jim Gross, were, indicted by the grand jury of Leslie county, Ky., for stealing a hog, charged to be of the value of more than $4, belonging to Alex Nantz, the punishment for which is fixed by section 1196, Baldwin’s 1936 Revision of Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes, which reads as follows:

“If any person shall steal a hog of the value of four dollars or more he shall be confined in the penitentiary not less than one nor more than five-years.”

Upon trial on this charge, the defendants were convicted and sentenced to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  2. Hudspeth v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Gray v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Stephens v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Page v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RudeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Mullins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. State v. RudeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API