Legal Opinion

Sharrow v. City of Dania

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 4, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The order appealed from herein is as follows:

“This cause was duly presented by Counsel upon motion of the defendants A. V. B. Bailey and Theodorus Bailey, her husband, and on motion of the City of Hollywood, to dismiss the first amended bill of complaint.
“Plaintiffs, as taxpayers, allege that the City of Hollywood in 1929, and within the two year statutory period of redemption, sold certain municipal tax certificates on the basis of 75 °/0 of their par value (to A. V. B. Bailey, a married woman). At the time the taxes became liens the lands involved were in the City of Hollywood, but…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Butts Ragan v. PeacockSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Ranger Realty Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Townsend Burns Ridgeway v. PeacockSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Smith v. DaffinSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. City of Marianna v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baskin v. GriffithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  2. Metropolitan Dade County v. MaddoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  3. Jasper v. St. Petersburg Episcopal Community, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. The Travis Co. v. MayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API