Legal Opinion

In re Crawford

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 16, 1994No. 93-B-3148PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*136DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM *.

Respondent, Eddie Crawford, was formally charged with failure to act with due diligence and promptness, failure to properly inform his client, failing to promptly refund the unearned portion of the fee paid, and failure to return his client’s documents, in violation of rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.15, 1.16 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The facts developed at the hearing indicated that respondent represented Ms. Lottie S. Chapman in connection with the succession of her mother, and received a $475.00 fee from her. Respondent never opened or completed the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re CrawfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. In re YaegerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  3. In re CrawfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API