Legal Opinion

In re Yaeger

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 5, 1997No. Nos. 97-B-1610 to 97—B-1612PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

liPER CURIAM*

Respondent, Paul F. Yaeger, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana, was formally charged by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel based on professional misconduct involving four separate clients. The matters were subsequently consolidated. It was alleged that respondent’s conduct violated Rules 1.1 (failure to provide competent representation); 1.2(b) (failure to properly document the scope of his representation); 1.3 (failing to act with reasonable diligence); 1.4(a) (failing to communicate with his client); 1.16 (failing to. surrender client file upon…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re DurusauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. In re BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  3. In re CrawfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re YaegerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. In re SchaeferSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API