Legal Opinion

Talbot v. Quaker State Oil Refining Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1938No. 3023PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McVICAR, District Judge.

Plaintiffs aver in their bill, that they are the owners of patent 1,890,421 for new and useful improvements in “Non Refillable Receptacles”; that defendant has infringed the same. They seek an injunction and an accounting. Defendant, in its answer, denies validity and infringement. It also sets up as a special defense therein, paragraphs A, B and C, wherein it avers that plaintiffs are estopped and barred by the decree of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 322 Pa. 155, 185 A. 586; that the infringements complained of are within defendant’s contractual rights, as previ…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Aspinwall, Manuf'g Co. v. GillUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
  5. Blackledge v. Weir & Craig Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schering Corporation v. Roussel-Uclaf Sa, Involuntary v. Zeneca Inc. And Zeneca Holdings Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API