Legal Opinion

Teager v. Landsley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 20, 1886PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Cedar Rapids Superior Court. Action in equity to restrain the defendants from prosecuting an action at law in the courts of Minnesota. The relief asked by the plaintiffs was granted, and the defendants

1Opinion of the Court

Seevers,' J.

The plaintiffs are husband and wife, and they are residents of this state. They became indebted to E. II. Prescott, who is also a resident of this state. Prescott obtained a judgment against the plaintiffs for such indebtedness. The plaintiff, Robert Teager, was an employe of the Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Company, and Prescott caused an execution to issue on his judgment, and attached the company as garnishee. There was a trial in the courts in this state, and it was found that the money due from the railroad company was exempt from execution, and therefore the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keyser v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  2. Andrews & Smith v. Burdick & GobleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Royal League v. KavanaghIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Deeds v. GilmerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Wabash Railway Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Kahn v. KahnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. Jones v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API