Legal Opinion

Roe v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided June 12, 2001No. TC-MD 000905FPublished

1Opinion of the Court

SALLY L. KIMSEY, Magistrate.

Plaintiffs appeal Defendant’s tax assessment for tax year 1999. A telephone trial was held November 6, 2000. Because of a legal issue raised at trial, the court granted the parties time after the trial to submit additional materials. Vance Roe and Shannon Roe appeared for themselves. David Zeh, Auditor, appeared for Defendant.

Plaintiffs assert that their income,1 although earned in Oregon, is exempt from state income tax under Public Law *397101-322, the Amtrak Reauthorization and Improvement Act of 1990 (Amtrak Act).

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Plaintiffs are residents of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Harris Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Shaw Ex Rel. Zollner v. PACC Health Plan, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API