Legal Opinion
Allen v. Rehman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 8, 2000No. CIV.A.00-2429 (RMU)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff brings this breach-of-contract action based on an alleged investment he made in a nightclub owned by the defendants. The plaintiff, Carlos Allen (“the plaintiff’ or “Mr. Allen”), proceeding pro se, alleges that the defendants, Mike Rehman and William Panos (“the defendants”), violated a verbal agreement to give the plaintiff a 10-percent equity share and a management role in a Washington, D.C. nightclub in exchange for the plaintiffs $30,000 investment. Because the amount in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Louisville, Cincinnati, & Charleston Rail-Road v. LetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
3Cited by2 opinions
- Candido v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Ayers v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021