Legal Opinion
Nachazel v. Miraco Mfg.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 23, 1988No. 87-146PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHULTZ, Justice.
The significant issue in this breach of warranty action is whether the buyer may recover consequential damages for interest on a purchase price loan and costs of installation of the defective product. The trial court submitted these items of damages to the jury for its consideration. We hold that the interest and a portion of the installation were not incurred as a result of the breach.
Laddie and Linda Nachazel brought this action against Miraco Manufacturing for damages arising out of the purchase from defendant of hog farrowing houses and nurseries known as Mirahuts.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. MartiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago SouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Oak Leaf Country Club, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Cronk v. Iowa Power and Light CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- DeWaay v. MuhrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kelly v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Gerst v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Landmark Health Care Associates L.P.-1989-A v. BradburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Des Moines Flying Service, Inc. v. Aerial Services Inc. Cedar Valley Aviation, LLC and Kirk P. FisherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Woods v. SchmittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.