Legal Opinion

Shaffer Bros. v. Rhynders

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 12, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Chickasaw District Court. — Hon. A. N. .Hob-son, Judge. Appeal from tbe judgment of'tbe district court establishing tbe intervener’s lien upon a car load, of horses as against tbe claim of tbe plaintiff under a writ of attachment.

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, J7 —

1 The plaintiff having attached the horses while in the possession of the carrier under consignment to Crandall & Co., at Buffalo, N. Y., the bank intervened, alleging that at the time of such attachment the title to said property was in the intervener, and that its rights were superior to any claim obtained by plaintiff under his attachment. The intervener’s claim is based upon the followng alleged state of facts: Rhynders, desiring to purchase horses for shipment to Crandall & Co., at Buffalo, N. Y., applied to the bank for money to be used in that business. The bank thereupon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Bank of Rochester v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  2. First National Bank v. Mount Pleasant Milling Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Morse v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scott v. W. H. McIntyre Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. In Re Estate of KinnanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. What Cheer Savings Bank v. MowerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. American Thresherman v. Citizens Bank of AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Exchange National Bank v. McCafferySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API